Para-model

I will begin at the end, or rather the present.
Less than two paragraphs in:
What's Left of the Left. Why do I begin at that moment? Allow me to begin again at this moment.
What is Left of the Left?
(the lede of the link)(4)***
Is this a geometric or quantitative heading?
What is not right about the left?
Or how much of the left is still there?

Now if I may do a Hansel and Gretel impersonation...my point is that I have worked out my path off-blog. i.e. left some pebbles to attempt to trace my path.
The reality is that I got the article from** MSNBC*, (current lede) Actually I got the link not the article. So I am still working it out, but will now save my Para-model.doc with this.

* actual clip here later
**anachronistic conundrum(or appropriate con un drum)[Cain beating the media.(1)]
*** post save doc: golf term "four"/Mulligan?

[Now I must note that I will square [bracket(#)] and or continue after reading more.]
[I should now note that I have left open a blog I was editing, which has now been inserted in my Para-model.doc ala my Hansel and Gretal MO. Apparently the pebbles were bread crumbs, but in reading What is Left of the Left, noticing that I have read only one of seven pages, I must MoveOn for the time being.]
[Now... actually just moments after the last bracket I will make a point.(see **(1) On what the heck is Cain doing? He is working the model of the media, in a fourth branch sort of way. He is getting attention, and I will sort out that fourth dimension. And I must note I am impressed with Joe the Plumber and Rupert the Survivor as candidates of a third kind. Not to call them, "Out There". But I think there is something to the polarity and needing more perspectives than our parties and branches provide. And this is reflected in a mechanics and dynamics, that is not just two dimensional. But Steven Jobs did point out to Rupert Murdoch that it can be either constructive or destructive. It is not about left or right, up or down, or forward or back again. It is about making progress or not. Everything else is how, and by and for whom? Does any of this embedded here or in my saved doc, explain: that the more radical a comment the more coverage it gets? It might depend on if one is Leaning Forward or Fair and Balanced. Now, I know that there is some perspectivism here, but Fair and Balanced does not mean two dimensional. Now it just depends on if I am talking about the Media or Faux News.]
[My apologies for my Quantum Leap over the Big Cheese, I feel my bread crumbs may be safe in draft see image.]


[Andrea Mitchell: Why has the president waited? Because he wanted congress to do their job! That was my preemptive answer to the preemptive question. Meaning, I was expecting the question and anticipated the answer, which just may be in the unfinished heading: What is Left of the Left.(No question mark or exclaimation mark?)]
[Speaking of Hands or Thumbs: L-curve anyone?]


[My para-model.doc is a bibliograpy of sorts(pun intended). Some Late Entries.: not to mention blog searches for con+scious, con+science, anarchy, tyranny, and thumb and buffet.]
[For the record Searches @thumb= Star Chamber/Big Cheese/Para-Model/Obama Doctrine/Who are they calling?. @buffet= Para-model/Big Cheese/From GOP to NOP/Brackets and Debt Clock/N-oddly Enough/All Politics is Local/Commander in Chief/Off the Cliff/Irony versus Hypocrisy. By this I am recording what the Al Gore Rythms find, just in case something changes.]
[This is bleapin' freaky considering my heading and intention here: The last of my late entries, and the last thing(or link) in my para-model.doc is this and (THIS)is the first thing Ed Schultz is talking about when I turn on his show. QED? Not to mention the rest of his show, which is yet to run(he is going on about Romney in Ohio? and a clear plan, and Democrats losing the message war, then Bernie Sanders and the NYtimes poll?), but is actually digitally delayed for local radio.]

Still going? QED?]

The Pinnacle?

[The following is just a few short pieces that spin off from some other material.]
[From an email:]
From January 4th, 2007
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

[OR BACK FROM THE PRECIPICE:] (posted and re-titled 1-11-07)


BY THE WAY: (Not Buy the Way)

Politics, Physicalities, Philosophies and Psychologies seem to fit my tetrahedron of how things work, but being unbalanced or in denial of their part in the whole may be why we are where we are and keep getting where we've been. This is my just honed perspective of a model and I must remember that that is all it is, but that it needs work. (The following reflect parts of the puzzle, and spin off from my post today.)

Hiding Behind the Straw Argument

Resolved?

[Now another spin-off from: For America's Sake.]

A Platonic(Model) Narrative
Or Being the Narrative?
Politics, Physics, Philosophy and Psychology may be the four points but politics may be the pinnacle. The pinnacle could be considered by some to be a W as well, and certainly by the current president. But the reality is that We are all susceptible to behavior, thinking and feelings that We each are the pinnacle and the Power. But W can also stand for the Wonders, the Words and the Works, not to mention the We that is too often denied. For many W is only about the Win, but it can’t be without the We, or it is just about the One. It may just prove the legitimacy of this model, that one cannot be without the rest.

Work in progress…

 …a self reference as well as the situation of this process.  

Open Letter  The First page of this blog.

#1 Discipline   The first Vertex of my Model.

The Hit and Run Gang.  The 4 vertices Of the model.

Speculative Physics. The first use of the tetrahedron.

The Hit and Run Gang

and the book ends of history or
THE CON-TEXT : (The Pinnacle? 1-11-07)
[from which I resubmit the following segment on my tetrahedron of being, to give context to the book ends and book marks, and why history will be not only rewritten but replayed.]
THIS MATERIAL WAS NOT ORIGINALLY SO CONTEXTED: [Comments and links added.]

* * * * * * * * *
[Now another spin-off.][From http://www.commondreams.org/views07/0105-26.htm ]

A Platonic(Model) Narrative? Or Being the Narrative?

Politics, Physics, Philosophy and Psychology may be the four points but politics may be the pinnacle. The pinnacle could be considered by some to be a W as well, and certainly by the current president. But the reality is that We are all susceptible the behavior, thinking and feeling that We each are the pinnacle and the Power. But W can also stand for the Wonders, the Words and the Works, not to mention the We that is too often denied. For many W is only about the Win, but it can’t be without the We, or it is just about the One. It may just prove the legitimacy of this model, that one cannot be without the rest.

Then I read:
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/1222-24.htm

* * * * * * * * *

There are several F words that can also be applied, freedom is the force that must have a form that must not be feared. A W which may get too much neglect is the want, while others emphasize it. It is all about what "I" want, while there are more "I"s neglected. The power of our ideas, our intentions, and our ideals.

Foe Cult

Benghazi
GOP 4mat
Nye/SE
4Mu(oo)L8 [?]

fn

Re:Hegel
There is a tendency, if not a nature to understand things through a model of one's own understanding.  That does not say whether one can or can't(I will avoid Kant) understand another's model, or whether one needs to understand another's(anyone's) to get somewhere.  But recognition of the thesis, antithesis, and synthesis(~process~), does not obviate, prove, solve or even have a point. 

iiiIII COh?

(5-13-14 edit, ~add~)

FOOTNOTES PAGE ONE- MAY 2014

5-4-14  In Spiration: Salon-W.R. Klemm / Sch~hhh[!] ... Who started it, I finished it, it still needs sense. (Ctrl F: sense ) Everything Model? A. Para-model, B. Almost makes me want to tweet. , C. Wittgenstein, D. The Politics of the Table. , E. What the Beck? (Witt Gen Stein's Buffet)   Milo Wolfowitz (FP2)

5-5-14:  fath:   ...:   gr :  your : [nexus, cats, herstory, herding] 1.A. NEXUS REVIEW (Re-posted) , B., C., D., E., F., G., H., I.  2. A., B. C. D. Reigning wags and tales ...  M. 3. EH? The History of B.S. 4[$]. A. B., C.Congress is Like Herding Death Panels!, D. What's good for the goose... [?] ow!  

5-7-14: SkyNet published from 5-6-14. Yes link inserted, but italics added. 

5-29-14 this:  Nixon- Plausible Deniability / Bush 43- Plausible Incompetence / Snowden- Plausible What?  Hence the word.  Posting based solely on NBC link.  4Later digging/yet/to read.  ...& further D'Ribble rather than G'Ribble;  Plausible Disciplination asks about his education and training in law or civics or what else he was educated in that might inform his understanding of this exchange with authorities, not that we should expect constitutional scholars not to have varied opinions.  Italics: not a foundation for my ainfount[><].  i.e. bu'dump ump[~]

Dimentionalism(sic)

[sic] is another tangent or dimensionalism [!]
Dimentions?
Two* Points.

*fore, six, eight

[Charts and Images]
Uncoining (sp!), will utilized (sic) or [sic] or [!]
Speaking of blocks, inside or outside...


SEGUE, my points here for further consideration:
The future of Occupy: Four key questions
Super Committee/Progressive Breakfast
Leaning Forward?

Weak in Review[!](Morning Joe)

IN PROGRESS:
Star Chanber
Para-Model
Martin Bashir and GUESTS.

Jonathan Alter and David Corn share their perspectivism of the 2012 GOP crop. What caught me was the "process of elimination" crack by the former.

Yet to insert or finish.
SEGUE TWO: The Platonic Cultural Model of the Tetrahedron given quantum form. Politics is about power and culture, but the latter may be the point. Politics may be the 4th dimensions of the phsyical, mental and emotional realities. What is the point" Who decides? And back again. I am not yet ready to overlay a tetrahedron, but it seems that the military represents an element like math, or a structure like religion and economics. It is a tool, and a force, not that religion, economics and goverment aren't. It may be seen that government is a hinge point, where there may be more politics in anarchy than tyranny. Part of this new connection(military) is thanks to the service of a soldier to which I give thanks again. His service was also in the slippery slope of rhetoric where the issue was who guards the "gates of American Democracy", which ironically spun out of control over the Obama/Jobs issue. There seemed a lack of appreciation or understanding of the jobs of the three branches of goverment and the relationship to defending it. The military certainly defends our security, but as for our rights, if they(our rights) were not used, they would be lost, and then what would they be fighting for? And if they were not used freely, they might be fighting for nothing more than what other countries are fighting for. But who am I to say who might understand that?

Looking Back, and Moving On.

Thanks for Thom Hartmann reference to Naomi Klein Year Zero

A few years later,something I just googled up on the Unified Model of Reality which Bush violates. [America's Darwin Awards and a Philosophy Assignment
by Martin Schönfeld / Commondreams.org]

Which fits my PBMP "Power Broker Mountain Project" which is about how things work and it is not just "trickle down". The three branches of government are just one example of how things should work and what it is about. The point is progress and the people. You can't "trickle down" till you get there and try getting there without the system (structure, environment, culture) and other people.

The points of my "Tetrahedron Model of Reality" is basically the fields of physics, philosophy, and psychology which represent forces, thoughts and feelings but the point is the big project.

And now John Nichols: "Bush may have been wrong about war presidents being popular." On "The Genius of Impeachment".

Enough for now, I have my own reality to work on, for the time being.

Bio ~ engineering.

My first major was Chemical Engineering at USC before a stint in their East Asian Languages and Cultures Department.*  After a sabbatical for a number of years, the result was a BA in Liberal Studies at the University of Washington.

[anachronistic writing]**
*removing the impression that I am at all responsible for the hyperlink
** the following are notes in progress akin to side notes on a page being read

NOTES:
Madhyamaka     /     Dialetheist       crazy ~  unmattaka
M-theory of D {?}
Paraconsistent Logic
Paradox ~ ironic ~ rhetorical device
Conceptualization ~/~ falsifies

Nietzsche: tT~ER (eternal recurrence)
Radical Contextualist Semantics ~requires meaning
Statement ~\~ truthmaker (not required)

=====================   segue   ==========
W-Theory  ~ Milo Wolff
Logical Positivism   Fusion v. Confluence
Defluence is the struggle[!]
=====================   theory?==========
LEVEL TWO NOTES:
W for Wolff AND Wave
Not to mention paradox of M.
Model / Madhyamaka / meaning?
D for Dialetheist, Dimensions and Design
Even rougher notes:
Paraconsistent Wittgenstein
Popper's poker.
=============
Then there is Methane[!]
Big T, and small t: Truth and Tetrahedron
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

* asterisk info only added 5-2-16
Pardon my style.

Laughter is the Best Medicine?

This is not just a google of the day. It is about a search for meaning. It is not about two sides* agreeing so they must be right or the answer being in the middle of two extremes, but it is about what works maybe not being even on that line or plane. I take as a model, the constitution and its three branches, the legislative, the executive and the judicial, but what of they be, in the of, by and for? Well that would be from another speech but there is the preamble, not to mention the declaration. The point is that if two perspectives agree it does not make their agreement correct, there may be another perspective that gets them off the dime of the teeter totter. Not to mention if three agree it will get us anywhere, let alone progress or good. The recent UN action on Libya is a prime example of progress, not on the agreement that it receives in popular opinion, but that it is a change in the process. It is not a final solution, but it is an international community effort of which, we have only just begun to talk.

*on disagreement with involvment in Libya

[I take the stand that the President is within the spirit of the law until the law is respelled.]

[But myth** of the day? And based on two links back, this site is not necessarily a myth buster but maybe some reactions will.]

** links that follow are not exactly copacetic or flowing naturally, but I will point to the foundations of myth in this faux debunker. His arguments are too based on the myths that may be the subject of this piece. "Myth(one): Social Security didn’t create the deficit and shouldn’t be cut to fix it". Half true, and the other half not the only solution. Anything further may be besides the point. From Myth Two: "As long as voters consider(...), they will be." Well, duh. Fill in the blank. This guy is, in my mind,(using his own words)"... Exhibit A in why it is so hard to fix them." In some ways he misses his own myth or actual truth: "In other words, the myth misses the point. Whether Social Security continues to pay benefits at today’s rates isn’t a question of credit quality. It’s a question of politics and priorities." And his most destructive myth: "Which brings us to what may be the most destructive myth of all: The idea that Social Security is, fiscally speaking, an end in itself." And the height of I Ron Knee: "The discussion we need to have, then, isn’t simply whether we can pull the levers to bring Social Security into balance. That is easy." This might be Exibit B of mything with myths.

13 and a half men?

C-Birds
and 16 models of the 3-body /metadigms*

Non-live blogging of the Seahawks Game. 
A tip of the model to Frank 'n Warner Bros.
Homage to the 12th man and some odd plays or caws.

Final 9-27 Seahawks over Rams.

*some rough notes^ on the field of math^^

^ 12-30 two added (b.s.)(FP)
^^ one added
1-30-14 label added

MAD: formerly know as...

MUTUALLY ASSURED DESTRUCTION

now as MAINLY ACCEPTED DECEPTION:
[this material was sent out 1-19-07: link at bottom found today]

There are too many potential links to alert you to, but the above should hit the mark. The point is do we intend to move forward or are we going back? Nuclear Proliferation seems the height of counter productivity in the so called new world since 9-11. It is not just MAD but INSANE and that stands for nothing, but where we are headed. That may be the real point of their madness. Hit and Run, somebody wins but what?
But I high-lite more of my own links and my own model, which is not just the fanciful reconstruction of ancient thinkers but what has always been the project for debate and what power too naturally denies.

http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2007/01/just-thought_17.html

"Just a thought" can be punctuated several ways, but "Just" is more, than just assuming that things are "old" or "new". Just is the purpose of our constitution, the only thing the president is sworn to defend. "Just" is the project our founding fathers settled on in it's words and even the preamble gets lost in the difference between needs and wants.

http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2007/01/running-list-and-reference-links.html

http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2007/01/hit-and-run-gang.html

These links bookend the long and short of it, and hopefully will be of help, but the point I will end on is how can we expect that a "War on Terrorism" will be at all successful if offense is not just the last resort, but their only plan to end it, while avoiding the law is their first and last concern?

The Point...

of the model?
Obama is not the point!

We are.  **

Knot to make a point or play with triads...*

OK, I pun on not, but do not mean this is not a knot.  Nor knot a not.



*To further d'triadics[?] (Mod-L) Knowlegdge, NowLedge, GNOwLedge?
Speaking of T(...)ing. 

Gn? ABC
A big F'nD! ^

^  Ctrl F "deal"
Hard to Believe
GBM
{A tip of the CAP}

** OW: 1st Sequester Label. 2nd Budget Label

Ghost Busters

Every thing is PC. (Politically Conceptual) 

Politics is the 4th* dimention(sic) of nature.(FP1)


* FB posting 2-25 / recreating here 2-26-14

F'n anachronism:  i.e. S.E. (vi) edgy
O W.

 

[anachronistic construction of this post, the indicated youtube(*) was not fully viewed at insert]

Tan gents ? STOP!  These inserts are like judging a blog by my model. I have only viewed one of them.  Or in computer lingo GOTO line one.  Here I will jump to a missing link, not to practice*** quantum effects***. Dimensions are not dimentions without a perspective.  (Un-M-String from Slice of Pi^)**

[Planck's Length?]

 

** hit pause @ 0:13(4M theory?)

^ Cut the Cow Pie!

*** : Geometry of Purpose , Wittgenstein

 

2-27-14 [Are we?]

vis a vis

partisan
furcation
~~~~~~~
We R all Right?
Left ? In Sync ?

[...]
Reading In Progress[***]
"Timing is everything."
NOTE:(b.s.) "amigoes"*

*need to unMbed Amit Goswami
Q-3
Ghost Busters
"buying a stairway"
String Cheese Theory?
Dimentionalism(sic) // (s.c.)
Para-model -- //
From Political Calculus to Theoretical Physics
Dateline: August 10th, 2005

In Spiration

Con Spiracy?

Every discipline may be a bigot of it's own nature.

G'Ribble?  #=%~$
Model Theory

[5-5-14 Not your grandfather's'...]
(The nexus is in the math [!] ... ?)

Almost makes me want to tweet.

The Tweet
The lede?

Well truthout.org headed an email as:
The Model is the Message.
Everything is on the table.
That is what Obama has frequently said, so get to the table.
By Jove!
[10-20-11: Actually there are some things that are off the table for everyone, but they are not always the same things or the same people. Like violence and social security as just examples. A crowd is not always able to control the violence of individuals let alone individual authorities. And taking social security off the table would mean that it doesn't get the help it needs. Everything getting on the table does not mean that it gets off the table, but people had better be with it.]

The Tetrahedron Ramble*

What the heck** is the point? I revisit my Power Broker Mountain Project, or actually move on. What I call the prime disciplines as in fields of study, Physics, Psychology, and Philosophy form the base with Progress or their result as the point of their projection or application forming a reality or culture, as we know it, or think we know it, or feel we apply it, regardless.

The perspective that caused me to reconsider this model, or concept (as it also may be the perspective) is a proposition that Science, Religion, Politics, and Economics,(structures) have at least three things in common: Values, Ideology, and Power.(VIP) Now I don't want to be restricted to the math or geometry or insistence that there is meaning in them for some sake other than they are structures. But conceptually they are at the point of the tetrahedron and not the point of the tetrahedron any more than culture. Now to some this may have gotten nowhere, but we will get somewhere, with or without consideration of VIP and the Very Important Point of who and what we are or will become.

Is it no coincidence that there are three branches of the government, Legislative, Executive and Judiciary based on the constitution and the preamble, or that the first 10 amendments are called the Bill of Rights? Freedom and Justice are not forces to reckon*** with, but create.

*somewhat impromptu
** search fuzzy math and English; not to mention viscious cycle or golden rule
*** "bottom line"

"Timing is everything."

[Rough draft: ]
A phrase I recently Googled.
And today noted.

1. a. Curve Balls?, e. Connecting the Dots, l. PC [^]
2., 3.,
4. (b.s.) "perpendicular": a. Anachronism, b. Heuristic Concurrence and ...

[continued 9-22-14: To whom it may regard...]
Hot, cold, wet, dry.  Father Quido Nye[!]
Up s. c.[!] d'acronible candle schtick.

Nye: A. B.
Quido: A.  Mocumentary: Expelled (Exposed?) , B.
Facebook Town Hall (amended) , C., D., E.  2 Reid's later? , F. Missing M-bed , G. Wise Crack , H.  REFRAIN is a Heckuva Paradocs[!] , I.  A Funny Thing Happened... , J. Dog Days, Raven Nights?, K. Darned if you do, darned if you don't..., L. Frank Knight , M. The Challenge? , N. Off Track Betting , O. "Can't Get There From Here" , P. McCain camp sexist. , Q. Stranger than Science (Fiction) [?]
Father: A., B. Rat Races Van Mices?, C. Pink Floyd,

The Ge Oh Metrics? 

The thing about timing(TIME) is that there is more than one perspective on its definition. Not to be ironically reflective by taking time from timing, but that may cover an aspect of it.  Maybe scratch or reboot this.  The forth(`) dimention(^) is the stick.  Not to men shun the Three Amigoes.

Re: 4th Dimention

(^) Arthur Young(sic)
(`) my psych [?]

[This has become a rather hard draft but(~) speaking of timing (dot,dot,dot)?]
(~) A., B., C. D., E., F. (buh dump ump  : d. Para-model) Now that is Gravy~ Toss~ [!] ~OW[!]
~  \\  BLANK NETWORK, ~ [<\\>]  a.,b., c.Wittgenstein
Gray V~: a., b. Re-Mix, c.Anachronism, d.Loose Threads, e., f. Divide to conquer?, g. 13 and a half men?  h. A Plea to Congress
[!] OW almost litter ally! Actually I just flipped open the hard copy and landed on the strip.

To all those who served...

a venerable Veteran's Day!

Every American should be grateful for your service in protecting America and its freedoms. Every one of those freedoms should be honored[*] and fought for by every American or it would be just another country.

[Update Labels]
[Goedel and Goethe, Stephanie Miller and Mike Molloy, Ying and Yang? The Platonic Cultural Model, Tyranny/Anarchy dynamics. It's more than Math or Geometry.]
[*] 11-12-11 Platitudes Re:/v. Platonics(SEGUE TWO): With Romney in mind, nonetheless. (More Over)